In alcune parti della Terra il 30 settembre si verificherà la Luna Nera.
Per molti un chiaro segnale dell'inizio della fine del Mondo
Arriva la Luna Nera, almeno in alcune zone del nostro Pianeta.
Non stiamo parlando della diciottesima carta dei tarocchi ma bensì di un
fenomeno lunare insolito ma non così raro. Nella sera-notte del 30 settembre,
in alcune parti della Terra, più precisamente tra Oceania e Asia orientale, si
verificherà la seconda Luna nuova del mese, definita appunta Luna Nera o Black
Moon. Un fenomeno che si ripete mediamente ogni 32 mesi.
Si parla di Luna nuova quando la faccia visibile del nostro
satellite naturale è completamente in ombra. Di conseguenza la Luna ci appare
nera o non visibile. In maniera più
tecnica la Luna nuova avviene quando nel corso della sua orbita il nostro
satellite è in congiunzione col Sole, cioè si frappone tra la Terra e il Sole. Se il novilunio si verifica quando la Luna si
trova in un nodo della sua orbita, cioè sta attraversando il piano eclittico,
la Luna risulta allineata perfettamente con la Terra e il Sole e perciò provoca
il fenomeno delle eclissi di Sole.
Ma perché tanto scalpore per questa Luna Nera?
Perché per molti sarà il segnale di un'imminente catastrofe
o per i più pessimisti persino l'inizio della fine del Mondo. I teorici di questa
cospirazione sostengono che quanto si verificherà in questo mese ricalcherà appieno un
passo contenuto nel Vangelo di Matteo (24:29), dove si legge: " Subito dopo la
tribolazione di quei giorni, il sole si oscurerà e la luna non darà più la sua
luce, le stelle cadranno dal cielo e le potenze dei cieli saranno scrollate".
In
altre parole i teorici ritengono che la prima parte della profezia si è
verificata ad inizio mese quando è avvenuta un'eclissi solare ad anello,
durante la quale la Luna era perfettamente allineata con Terra e Sole. Venerdì,
invece, la luna non darà più la sua luce, ovvero ci sarà un novilunio, e di conseguenza
le stelle cadranno dal cielo e le potenze dei cieli saranno scrollate.
A smorzare i toni ed evitare inutili allarmismi ci hanno
pensato tuttavia gli scienziati affermando che non c'è nulla da temere, e la Terra
andrà avanti come al solito durante e dopo la Luna Nera.
http://www.3bmeteo.com/giornale-meteo/arriva-la-luna-nera--sar--la-fine-del-mondo--117750
Settembre 2016
sabato 1 ottobre 2016
PIOVE nel DESERTO del Sahara
NORD AFRICA. PIOVE nel DESERTO del Sahara
Una
perturbazione ha raggiunto l'entroterra nord africano e distribuisce
piogge dal Marocco alla Tunisia. I fenomeni interessano anche il deserto
algerino
Ogni tanto piove anche nel deserto. Non è poi così raro, anche se solitamente ciò avviene verso la fine della stagione invernale. Oggi però la pioggia è arrivata lo stesso, grazie alla formazione di un'area di bassa pressione tra Marocco e Algeria nordoccidentale che orchestra una perturbazione piuttosto vasta, anche se non sempre foriera di piogge.
PIOVE IN MAROCCO. Piove sul Marocco orientale, dove sono ancora i rilievi dell'Atlante a caratterizzare il territorio e in quota fa anche piuttosto fresco. Intorno a 1000m di quota, in prossimità del confine con l'Algeria, la colonnina è inchiodata sui 15°C e anche durante il giorno non discosterà molto da questo valore, a causa della copertura nuvolosa e delle piogge.
QUALCHE PIOGGIA SUL SAHARA ALGERINO. Spostando l'attenzione verso est si ritrovano piogge sulla desertica Algeria settentrionale, in pieno deserto del Sahara, anche se si tratta per il momento di piogge deboli. Piove a El Golea, sui 400m di quota, con 23°C. Fenomeni comunque destinati ad intensificarsi nelle prossime ore e per buona parte della giornata di domani, quando potranno sfociare anche in qualche temporale.
http://www.3bmeteo.com/giornale-meteo/nord-africa--piove-nel-deserto-del-sahara-117769
giovedì 29 settembre 2016
COMET LANDING ON FRIDAY: On
Friday, Sept. 30th, Europe's Rosetta spacecraft will deliberately crash
land on Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, ending the probe's two year
mission in orbit around the comet's nucleus. With cameras and other
instruments taking data until the last moment, Rosetta will descend
into a mysterious region known as Ma'at home to several "active pits," which are spewing jets of gas and dust into space. Rosetta's death plunge could be exciting, indeed. NASA TV will cover the event live starting at 3:15 a.m.PDT. Tune in!
http://spaceweather.com/
http://spaceweather.com/
Francis Effect: “Why join a church whose priests are little monsters and whose members like to throw stones?”
Has Pope Francis Failed?
By MATTHEW SCHMITZ at the NY Times
When Pope Francis
ascended to the chair of St. Peter in March 2013, the world looked on
in wonder. Here at last was a pope in line with the times, a man who
preferred spontaneous gestures to ritual forms. Francis paid his own
hotel bill and eschewed the red shoes. Rather than move into the grand
papal apartments, he settled in the cozy guesthouse for visitors to the Vatican. He also set a new nondogmatic tone with statements like “Who am I to judge?”
Observers
predicted that the new pope’s warmth, humility and charisma would
prompt a “Francis effect” — bringing disaffected Catholics back to a
church that would no longer seem so forbidding and cold. Three years
into his papacy, the predictions continue. Last winter, Austen Ivereigh,
the author of an excellent biography of Pope Francis, wrote that the
pope’s softer stance on communion for the divorced and remarried “could trigger a return to parishes on a large scale.”
In its early days, Francis’ Jesuit order labored to bring Protestants
back into the fold of the church. Could Francis do the same for
Catholics tired of headlines about child abuse and culture wars?
In a certain sense, things have
changed. Perceptions of the papacy, or at least of the pope, have
improved. Francis is far more popular than his predecessor, Pope
Benedict XVI. Sixty-three percent of American Catholicsapprove of him, while only 43 percent approved of Benedict at the height of his popularity, according to a 2015 New York Times and CBS News poll. Francis has also placed a great emphasis on reaching out to disaffected Catholics.
But are Catholics actually coming back? In the United States, at least, it hasn’t happened. New survey findings
from Georgetown’s Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate suggest
that there has been no Francis effect — at least, no positive one. In
2008, 23 percent of American Catholics attended Mass each week. Eight
years later, weekly Mass attendance has held steady or marginally
declined, at 22 percent.
Of
course, the United States is only one part of a global church. But the
researchers at Georgetown found that certain types of religious
observance are weaker now among young Catholics than they were under
Benedict. In 2008, 50 percent of millennials reported receiving ashes on
Ash Wednesday, and 46 percent said they made some sacrifice beyond
abstaining from meat on Fridays. This year, only 41 percent reported
receiving ashes and only 36 percent said they made an extra sacrifice,
according to CARA. In spite of Francis’ personal popularity, young
people seem to be drifting away from the faith.
Why
hasn’t the pope’s popularity reinvigorated the church? Perhaps it is
too soon to judge. We probably won’t have a full measure of any Francis
effect until the church is run by bishops appointed by Francis and
priests who adopt his pastoral approach. This will take years or
decades.
Yet
something more fundamental may stand in the way of a Francis effect.
Francis is a Jesuit, and like many members of Catholic religious orders,
he tends to view the institutional church, with its parishes and
dioceses and settled ways, as an obstacle to reform. He describes parish
priests as “little monsters” who “throw stones” at poor sinners. He has
given curial officials a diagnosis of “spiritual Alzheimer’s.” He
scolds pro-life activists for their “obsession” with abortion. He has
said that Catholics who place an emphasis on attending Mass, frequenting
confession, and saying traditional prayers are “Pelagians” — people who believe, heretically, that they can be saved by their own works.
Such
denunciations demoralize faithful Catholics without giving the
disaffected any reason to return. Why join a church whose priests are
little monsters and whose members like to throw stones? When the pope
himself stresses internal spiritual states over ritual observance, there
is little reason to line up for confession or wake up for Mass.
Even Francis’ most ardent fans worry that his agenda is overdue. When he was elected, Francis promised a cleanup of the Vatican’s corrupt finances. Three years on, he has started to retreat
in the face of opposition, giving up an outside audit and taking powers
away from his handpicked point man. Francis has also shied away from
big changes on doctrinal matters. Instead of explicitly endorsing
communion for the divorced and remarried couples, he has quietly urged
them on with a wink and a nod.
Francis
has built his popularity at the expense of the church he leads. Those
who wish to see a stronger church may have to wait for a different kind
of pope. Instead of trying to soften the church’s teaching, such a man
would need to speak of the way hard disciplines can lead to freedom.
Confronting a hostile age with the strange claims of Catholic faith may
not be popular, but over time it may prove more effective. Even Christ
was met with the jeers of the crowd.
Correction: September 29, 2016
An Op-Ed article on Wednesday about Pope Francis misstated the name of a center at Georgetown University. It is the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, not the Center for the Applied Research for the Apostolate.
An Op-Ed article on Wednesday about Pope Francis misstated the name of a center at Georgetown University. It is the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, not the Center for the Applied Research for the Apostolate.
India launches strikes on suspected militants in Pakistan
By Sanjeev Miglani and Asad Hashim
NEW DELHI/ISLAMABAD (Reuters): India
said on Thursday it had conducted “surgical strikes” on suspected
militants preparing to infiltrate from Pakistan-ruled Kashmir, making
its first direct military response to an attack on an army base it
blames on Pakistan.
Read: US and China won’t take sides in India-Pakistan fracas
The cross-border action inflicted significant casualties, the Indian army’s head of operations told reporters in New Delhi, while a senior government official said Indian soldiers had crossed the border to target militant camps.
The Indian announcement followed through on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s warning that those Delhi held responsible “would not go unpunished” for a Sept. 18 attack on an Indian army base at Uri, near the Line of Control, that killed 18 soldiers.
The strikes also raised the possibility of a military escalation between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan that would wreck a 2003 Kashmir ceasefire.
Lt General Ranbir Singh, the Indian army’s director general of military operations (DGMO), said the strikes were launched on Wednesday based on “very specific and credible information that some terrorist units had positioned themselves … with an aim to carry out infiltration and terrorist strikes”.
Singh said he had called his Pakistani counterpart to inform him of the operation.
India’s disclosure of such strikes was unprecedented, said Ajai Sahni of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi, and sent a message not only to his own people but to the international community.
“India expects global support to launch more focused action against Pakistan,” Sahni told Reuters. “There was tremendous pressure on the Indian prime minister to prove that he is ready to take serious action.”
http://atimes.com/2016/09/india-says-firing-continues-across-frontier-with-pakistan/
Shimon Peres: The architect of Israel's nuclear program
Perhaps his greatest achievement was the ability to make Israel's enemies believe that Israel had the ultimate strategic deterrence and a nuclear monopoly in the Middle East.
Dimona, beginning in the late 1950s and into the 1960s, saw the building of the "textile factory" - the nuclear reactor in which, according to foreign reports, Israel produces fissile materials - uranium and plutonium - for its arsenal of nuclear weapons. According to these reports, these weapons were, and remain, the central factor deterring Arab states and Iran from fulfilling their fantasies of eliminating Israel on the battlefield.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Shimon-Peres-The-architect-of-Israels-nuclear-program-468893
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)